The Place for Jersey City News
Log In / Register
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Jersey City Times
  • News
  • Food and Fun
    • Food And Drink
    • Performing Arts
    • Visual Arts
    • Other Fun Stuff
  • Education
  • Business
  • Neighborhoods
    • Downtown
      • News
      • Guide
    • Heights
      • News
      • Guide
    • Journal Square
      • News
      • Guide
    • Bergen Lafayette
      • News
      • Guide
    • Greenville
      • News
      • Guide
    • Westside
      • News
      • Guide
  • Opinion
  • Columns
    • Eye Level
    • Mamarama
  • Obituaries
  • Event Calendar
  • Support our Mission
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Op Ed: Administration’s Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance Has Too Many Loopholes

Op Ed: Administration’s Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance Has Too Many Loopholes

Eleana Little
October 20, 2020/0 Comments/in News, Opinion
by Eleana Little

This Wednesday, the City Council in Jersey City will consider for a second reading (and likely a vote) an inclusionary zoning ordinance recently put forth by the Fulop administration. Unfortunately for the people of Jersey City, this ordinance is inclusionary in name only, with abundant carveouts and loopholes for real estate developers to skimp on building affordable housing units.

In early 2019, City Council members Joyce Watterman and Rolando Lavarro introduced an inclusionary zoning ordinance, and the Fulop administration introduced a competing one, which was widely considered to be more developer-friendly. To reconcile the two ordinances, an Inclusionary Zoning Committee was formed, composed of the majority of council members. This committee, led by Councilperson Lavarro, held a series of meetings over the course of the past year, which were open for public viewing. However, after the committee reached a compromise through this transparent process, Mayor Fulop and his team put forth a new ordinance, developed entirely behind the scenes and ignoring many key provisions reached by consensus in committee. This is the ordinance now being considered by the City Council.

Not only was the process questionable, but the substance of this new ordinance is lacking in several key areas. In particular, we want to call attention to both the buyout provisions and the unrestricted ability of the council to waive the ordinance.

Although the City Council’s 2019 ordinance did not, the consensus that the Inclusionary Zoning Committee reached included limited buyout provisions. In the committee’s compromise, developers could bypass building affordable units in a new development in certain specific ways, e.g. by building in-lieu affordable units in the same ward. In contrast, the administration’s 2020 ordinance has myriad buyout provisions, allowing developers to forego affordable units if they pay or build other community benefits (loosely defined, including things like parking garages); they can also substitute in-lieu affordable units in completely different parts of the city. It’s hard to see how the administration’s 2020 ordinance won’t perpetuate the economic segregation already plaguing our city.

Most concerning, though, is the waiver provision in the administration’s 2020 ordinance, which allows the City Council to waive the inclusionary zoning requirements for any given development. In a city, county, and state with a robust history of corruption, where politicians regularly take large contributions from real estate developers and affiliates, this waiver provision is a gaping loophole and a pay-to-play disaster waiting to happen. There was discussion during this ordinance’s first reading about retaining the waiver provision for specific scenarios like land-use legal settlements. However, as it is written, there are no restrictions on the use of this waiver provision. If it’s only intended for use in a limited set of circumstances, why not delineate those? As of now, the ordinance can be waived for any development by a simple majority of the City Council.

One doesn’t have to imagine a scenario where a slate of candidates in a municipal election is bankrolled by one or more major developers. This is already the reality in Jersey City. Meanwhile, residents are stretched thin as rents rise higher and higher, and are tired of empty promises. How are we supposed to trust that our politicians will even bother to hold their developer benefactors to the terms of this ordinance, instead of waiving it altogether?

With this waiver provision, the administration’s inclusionary zoning ordinance is so full of loopholes it might fall apart. Its passage would allow Mayor Fulop to claim a faux-progressive feather in his cap as he makes moves on the political ladder, while still allowing business as usual for the class of developers that double as his political donors.

The City Council should revisit the findings of the Inclusionary Zoning Committee and craft an ordinance that will meaningfully increase affordable housing and economic diversity. The people of Jersey City deserve a strong inclusionary zoning ordinance—not this one.

Eleana Little
NJ-08 for Progress

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Jersey City, US
2:42 am, July 5, 2022
71°F
broken clouds
Wind: 6 mph
Pressure: 1019 mb

Latest Articles

Christopher Columbus Drive Jersey City
July 04, 2022 /

Downtown Streets Gridlocked by Fireworks Traffic

327 Ege Ave Jersey City
July 04, 2022 /

Report: Fireworks Suspected in West Side House Fire

Forget the Whale
July 02, 2022 /

Rogue Waves July: Six Concert Picks in Jersey City

Raisa Nosova "Uprooted"
July 01, 2022 /

Muralist Raisa Nosova Raises a Distress call for Ukraine

Dickinson High School Jersey City 16x9
July 01, 2022 /

Former Dickinson High School Teacher Pleads Guilty to Sexual Assault

CONTACT US

    ADS/INFO

    For information on advertising opportunities, please contact - ads@jcitytimes.com

    For information on writing opportunities, please contact - info@jcitytimes.com

    Download our media kit here

    ABOUT US

    About Jersey City Times

    Contact Jersey City Times

    Social

    Archives

    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    Copyright © 2020 JCityTimes.com. All Rights Reserved - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
    Small Parties, Family Gatherings Driving Up COVID-19 Case Count Fair Housing Group Calls for Changes to Proposed Inclusionary Zoning Ordina...
    Scroll to top