The Place for Jersey City News
Log In / Register
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Jersey City Times
  • News
  • Food and Fun
    • Food And Drink
    • Performing Arts
    • Visual Arts
    • Other Fun Stuff
  • Education
  • Business
  • Neighborhoods
    • Downtown
      • News
      • Guide
    • Heights
      • News
      • Guide
    • Journal Square
      • News
      • Guide
    • Bergen Lafayette
      • News
      • Guide
    • Greenville
      • News
      • Guide
    • Westside
      • News
      • Guide
  • Opinion
  • Columns
    • Eye Level
    • Mamarama
  • Obituaries
  • Event Calendar
  • Support our Mission
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
The Mayor Blinks on Trash Fees

The Mayor Blinks on Trash Fees

Aaron Morrill
July 25, 2021/in header, Latest News, News
by Aaron Morrill

With opposition growing daily, Mayor Fulop appears to be reversing his controversial decision to shift to individual homeowners the cost of trash pickup, a cost previously shouldered by the city.

“Suez/MUA has agreed to stop the billing on their new formula until that formula can be corrected,” he wrote yesterday in a Facebook post. Explaining his decision, the mayor blamed the Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority [MUA] and water company Suez for “sending out incorrect bills with regards to water billing that have been much larger than agreed upon.”

In a sign that Suez may have been caught unaware by the mayor’s flip-flop, four hours went by before it went on Twitter with a message to Jersey City residents. “Please DO NOT pay the Solid Waste fee on your current bill while we work with @JCMUA and @JerseyCity to ensure that bills are accurate.”

Neither the mayor nor Suez gave any indication as to what might replace the fee that began appearing on homeowners’ water bills in recent months and became known, derisively, as the “water tax.”

The mayor’s about-face was a surprise to some. Only three days earlier, the mayor had gone on “The City Show” to call complaints about the trash hauling fee “political rhetoric” and said that he was “happy to make [the] argument every single day” as to why the new charge was fair.

And, indeed, the mayor’s city council adversaries were quick to point out their long- standing opposition to the trash fee.

“I’m going to file this under ‘better late than never,’” said Ward E Councilman James Solomon. “We’ve been sounding the alarm on this backdoor, regressive, $300 flat tax on low income families since February.”

Said Councilman at large Rolando Lavarro, “I’m glad to see that Mayor Fulop has reversed course on his MUA backdoor tax. To be clear, the original intention of Mayor Fulop’s backdoor tax was never to create ‘tax fairness.’”

Mayoral challenger Lewis Spears also released a statement. “Jersey City residents were negatively impacted by the consequences of a policy that seemed to be rushed into place. They demanded to be heard and now we essentially have a reversal of course.”

Until yesterday, however, the mayor had been adamant that the trash collection charge wasn’t a tax increase. “If the average house is having a $300 increase [for trash] but their taxes are going down by $1000 how is that a backdoor tax?” the mayor asked in his City Show interview.

The mayor pointed out that tax-abated properties were not previously being charged for increases in the cost of garbage pick-up.  “Something like garbage collection that goes up exponentially every single contract…those tax abated buildings don’t participate in that.”

If there was an economic case to be made, however, many Jersey City residents weren’t buying it.  Barbara Waddell called the charge “totally unacceptable.” Dora Butler asked “why are we paying for garbage collection twice.”

Perhaps the most incisive critique came from Council at large Candidate Elvin Dominici and former State of New Jersey Auditor Caroline Algernon. In a detailed spreadsheet provided to the press, they illustrated how the owner of an expensive property Downtown would see a net savings from the new charge while the owner of a less valuable property would see a net increase in costs. Said Algernon, “this charge will undo much of the [tax benefit of the] reval” for property owners in less affluent neighborhoods.

With a petition against the “water tax” beginning to attract signatures and with a bevy of independent candidates and activists coalescing around the issue, it appears the mayor decided that making the  “argument [for it] every single day” of an election year wasn’t a great strategy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: Jersey City Government
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
You might also like
Fifteen Million Slated for Museum Raises Hackles at City Council Meeting
Proposed Pompidou Jersey City Editorial: The Immoral Price of Pompidou
Jersey City Municipal Concil City Council Narrowly Passes Exchange Place Budget with Controversial Plaza Redesign
Garbage bags on street Op Ed: Residents Should Speak Out Against Solid Waste Charges
Bonds, Cannabis, Islamophobia and Food Unfit for Stray Cats Dominate Council Meeting
A New Study Revives the Debate Over Property Tax Abatements
New Library Director Appointed Following Sudden Departure of Predecessor
“The Water Tax Was Never About Tax Fairness”
Jersey City, US
12:28 pm, July 5, 2022
86°F
clear sky
Wind: 16 mph
Pressure: 1016 mb

Latest Articles

Christopher Columbus Drive Jersey City
July 04, 2022 /

Downtown Streets Gridlocked by Fireworks Traffic

327 Ege Ave Jersey City
July 04, 2022 /

Report: Fireworks Suspected in West Side House Fire

Forget the Whale
July 02, 2022 /

Rogue Waves July: Six Concert Picks in Jersey City

Raisa Nosova "Uprooted"
July 01, 2022 /

Muralist Raisa Nosova Raises a Distress call for Ukraine

Dickinson High School Jersey City 16x9
July 01, 2022 /

Former Dickinson High School Teacher Pleads Guilty to Sexual Assault

CONTACT US

    ADS/INFO

    For information on advertising opportunities, please contact - ads@jcitytimes.com

    For information on writing opportunities, please contact - info@jcitytimes.com

    Download our media kit here

    ABOUT US

    About Jersey City Times

    Contact Jersey City Times

    Social

    Archives

    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    Copyright © 2020 JCityTimes.com. All Rights Reserved - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
    26 Year-Old-Man Gunned Down in Greenville Crime Scene Tape Crime Scene Tape 55 Year-Old Man Charged in Fatal Heights Stabbing
    Scroll to top