The Place for Jersey City News
Log In / Register
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Jersey City Times
  • News
  • Food and Fun
    • Food And Drink
    • Performing Arts
    • Visual Arts
    • Other Fun Stuff
  • Education
  • Business
  • Neighborhoods
    • Downtown
      • News
      • Guide
    • Heights
      • News
      • Guide
    • Journal Square
      • News
      • Guide
    • Bergen Lafayette
      • News
      • Guide
    • Greenville
      • News
      • Guide
    • Westside
      • News
      • Guide
  • Opinion
  • Columns
    • Eye Level
    • Mamarama
  • Obituaries
  • Event Calendar
  • Support our Mission
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Council Tables Controversial High Rise Bordering Berry Lane Park

Council Tables Controversial High Rise Bordering Berry Lane Park

Ron Leir
February 10, 2022/in Bergen Lafayette, header, Latest News, Narrate, News
by Ron Leir

Plans for a controversial 17-story, 421-unit residential tower in Bergen-Lafayette have been stalled anew.

The City Council narrowly voted Feb. 9 to delay ratifying a deal to greenlight developer Louis Mont’s plan to build the tower at the Steel Tech site at 417 Communipaw Ave. Mont’s proposal also includes a retail space for startups and a municipal recreation/community center.

Council members Mira Prinz-Arey (Ward B), Richard Boggiano (C), James Solomon (E) and Amy DeGise (at-large) sided with Ward F Councilman Frank Gilmore to table an ordinance adopting changes to the Morris Canal Redevelopment Plan.

Those changes incorporated the 17-floor tower configuration and a five percent affordable housing set-aside and had been sanctioned by the city’s Planning Board.

But area residents sued, contending that the tower’s height would negatively impact a neighborhood of predominantly one- and two-family homes and that the developer’s pledge to set aside five percent of the apartments as affordable units fell short of the 10–15 percent target called for in the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO) adopted by the city in December 2021.

A court subsequently ruled that the Planning Board should revisit the proposed changes at a new hearing and articulate the reasons it felt those changes conformed to the city’s master plan. Then, the court said, the City Council should take appropriate action.

At a new hearing in December 2020, the board concluded that the public concessions contemplated by the developer facilitate compliance with the city’s master plan. Now it’s up to the council to accept or reject the planners’ conclusions.

In an effort to press home the residents’ objections that the proposed tower is “just too big” for that neighborhood and to learn more about what—other than a basketball court—is planned for the rec center, Gilmore, accompanied by Ridley, met with Mont the day before the council meeting.

Gilmore said Mont appeared open minded. Nevetheless, the lawmaker said he wanted the council to table voting on the changes because residents “overwhelmingly, time and time again” insist that the tower would negatively impact the neighborhood.”

Gilmore asked if the city was under any court-imposed time constraints to act on the Planning Board’s findings. City Corporation Counsel Peter Baker said no.

Ridley, whose Greenville ward would encompass the project site under a newly adopted redistricting plan, asked Baker whether the city, under the newly adopted IZO, could compel Mont to designate at least 10 percent of the total number of apartments as affordable units. “No,” Baker said, because the amendments to the Morris Canal Redevelopment Zone originally approved by the council in 2020 pre-date the IZO.

Ridley voted against tabling, saying that she expected to “go back to the table” with Mont and the residents to continue discussions about increasing affordability along with “maybe spreading the building out” instead of going straight up and getting more details on the community benefits.

“Both sides are going to have to give a little,” the councilwoman said. No final decisions will be made until the Planning Board conducts a site plan review of the project, she added.

Boggiano, saying he’s witnessed similar unwelcome development incursions in his ward, voted to table, as did DeGise, Gilmore and Solomon, who said he saw “no harm” in continuing to meet with Mont to discuss the project.

Before the council debated the issue, the members heard from attorney Ronald Shaljian, representing the developer. Shaljian told the governing body that their “focus tonight”—determining whether to accept the Planning Board’s recommendation—“is very narrow.”

They also heard from Renee Steinhagen, executive director of the Public Interest Law Center, which is advocating for residents litigating the project. She contended that the Planning Board’s findings were inconsistent with the city’s master plan in allowing a building of that size and permitting a tradeoff of less affordability in return for community benefits.

June Jones, president of the Morris Canal Redevelopment Area Community Development Corp., which is suing the city over the project, credited Gilmore and Ridley for their efforts to scale back the tower and provide more affordability. Jones, who also attended the recent talks with Mont, said she found the meeting “productive” and was “hopeful” that a compromise could be reached that included a well-planned community center for people of all ages.

But, she said, “This is a work in progress. Right now, the project is only conceptual.”

Tags: Jersey City Government, Jersey City Real Estate and Development
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
You might also like
Fifteen Million Slated for Museum Raises Hackles at City Council Meeting
Proposed Pompidou Jersey City Editorial: The Immoral Price of Pompidou
Jersey City Municipal Concil City Council Narrowly Passes Exchange Place Budget with Controversial Plaza Redesign
Garbage bags on street Op Ed: Residents Should Speak Out Against Solid Waste Charges
Bonds, Cannabis, Islamophobia and Food Unfit for Stray Cats Dominate Council Meeting
Mystery of Boarded up Grove Street Retail Spaces Solved
Loew's Theater Jersey City Changes to Historic Loew’s Theater Tentatively Approved Despite Harsh Criticism
The Mayor Blinks on Trash Fees
Jersey City, US
10:55 am, July 3, 2022
79°F
clear sky
Wind: 12 mph
Pressure: 1017 mb

Latest Articles

Forget the Whale
July 02, 2022 /

Rogue Waves July: Six Concert Picks in Jersey City

Raisa Nosova "Uprooted"
July 01, 2022 /

Muralist Raisa Nosova Raises a Distress call for Ukraine

Dickinson High School Jersey City 16x9
July 01, 2022 /

Former Dickinson High School Teacher Pleads Guilty to Sexual Assault

NJCU
July 01, 2022 /

NJCU Acting President Kroll Issues a Statement on Social Media

United States Supreme Court
July 01, 2022 /

We Must Amend the New Jersey Constitution to Include a Right to Privacy

CONTACT US

    ADS/INFO

    For information on advertising opportunities, please contact - ads@jcitytimes.com

    For information on writing opportunities, please contact - info@jcitytimes.com

    Download our media kit here

    ABOUT US

    About Jersey City Times

    Contact Jersey City Times

    Social

    Archives

    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    Copyright © 2020 JCityTimes.com. All Rights Reserved - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
    Deadly Crash on Star-Crossed Bridge Crime Scene Tape Man Found Dead in Greenville: Authorities Investigating
    Scroll to top